Coronavirus Signals the Death Knell of the West
Posted On Tuesday June 3, 2020 by Chris Ogden under International Strategic Studies
Coronavirus Signals the Death Knell of the West
The slow and complacent reaction of the West to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic signals its foreseeable decline on the world stage, as well as the confirmation of the Asian 21st Century. With infection rates and deaths mounting daily, the prevalence of coronavirus across the West is quickly out-stripping those of the East Asian countries at the pandemic’s epicentre. At the time of writing [May 18 2020] the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Italy all have more cases, and more deaths, than in China. Notwithstanding that their country was the first to become infected, with several weeks passing before doctors realised that it was anything more than a common illness, cases in China have seemingly peaked and flatlined at around 84,000 infections with total deaths amounting to around 4,600. Elsewhere in the region, infections and deaths now stand at around 11,000 and close to 250 respectively in both South Korea and Japan.
Contrasting Responses
Once the situation was realised, the successful isolation of the outbreak in these countries has rested upon the rapid and overwhelming deployment of their centralised state capabilities. Learning from past epidemics such as SARS in 2002-03 and MERS in 2015, these measures have included the quarantining of entire provinces, cities, neighbourhoods and individual blocks, the shutting down of all critical infrastructure and transport links, as well as closing most education and government facilities. Citizens have been faced with extensive restrictions on their freedom of movement, along with the prospect of fines and imprisonment for ignoring government edicts. Such draconian and authoritarian minded actions have broadly mitigated the virus’ wider impact.
In contrast, western states have adopted a more sclerotic and wait-and-see approach. Rather than learning from the experience of those countries where the outbreak originated, leaders have not been proactive but responsive. At times downplaying the genuine significance of the threat, then backtracking on various approaches and often implementing actions on an ad hoc basis, this often languid attitude has combined with having limited domestic medical capacities. With broader public healthcare systems being underfunded, at least in the US and UK, and some governmental bodies steadily hollowed out by a decade of austerity, the ability to effectively test, confine and treat those infected has been inadequate. Rather than fighting the pandemic, these weaknesses have enabled the virus to spread faster, with no clear peaks as in East Asia in sight.
COVID-19 as the Third Knockout Blow
For the West, the impact and aftermath of the COVID-19 outbreak is the latest in a succession of events that have critically undermined its wider global legitimacy and reputation. Indeed, in the last two decades, the central pillars of their countries’ national power and strength have all been compromised. The first of these three blows came after the terrorist attacks of 9/11 that led to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. These foreign forays initiated by the US and the UK, resulted in a long quagmire of occupation, instability and widespread deaths, undercutting the acceptability of using overwhelming military force in international affairs. The use of rendition, torture and black sites further questioned the West’s moral validity and their ethical stance in geopolitics, while the political aims of these military campaigns appeared to be nebulous at best.
The 2008 credit crisis then served to challenge the core rationales of the largely western-build international financial system, irrevocably weakening the economic pillar of western power. It also called into question the suitability of associated global governance structures, and eventually resulted in the building of new alternative economic organizations such as the Asian Investment Infrastructure Bank by China. With these two events undermining the primary basis of much of traditional western power in military, economic and to a degree institutional terms, the current coronavirus crisis now questions the domestic and leadership capabilities of the West. By highlighting deep-seated internal weaknesses, the ability of western states to serve their most basic function, the protection of the well-being and security of their citizens has been brought into sharp focus, and when juxtaposed with the actions of East Asia countries, points to failure.
Foreseeable Decline
While the coronavirus will result in a deep global recession, as the rate of infections and deaths intensify the reputational gains made by East Asia and China in particular will rise. With peer recognition being a key element in countries becoming great powers, as Beijing’s legitimacy increases, that of western countries will inevitably decline. Already China is deploying its success against the pandemic as a soft power tool, for instance supplying ventilators, masks and medics to Italy and France, among others. In this way it is positioning itself as a global leader, supplanting western leaders in its wake, and building an authority to which others will turn at times of future crisis. As China re-starts its economy, allowing it to recover its material strength quicker, the GDP (in nominal terms) of the world’s first (the US), fourth (Germany), sixth (UK), seventh (France) and eighth (Italy) ranked economics are all looking set to take seismic long-term hits. These falls will badly hamper their domestic and international capacities, relegating their overall global stature.
In combination, these events, and the varying benefits and losses of the world’s leading powers within them, signals not only the foreseeable decline of the West on the international stage, but the accompanying confirmation of the Asian 21st Century. Displaying competent, proactive and stable leadership, and shielding their citizens from the worst of the crisis (the very raison d'être of national security), China and other East Asian states have succeeded where the world’s more developed countries have not. With China in particular and in more normal times, boasting the viability and fruitfulness of its authoritarian-capitalist development model, the West’s spearheading of global affairs in political and economic terms appears to be over. While it will take many many months for the pandemic to end, a new dawn in global affairs has already begun.
Chris Ogden
Chris is a Senior Lecturer / Associate Professor, researcher and author in Asian Politics at the School of International Affairs, University of St. Andrews, Scotland. He specialises in China and India’s rise to worldwide importance, and the study of great power politics, foreign policy and nationalism. Currently, he is developing a range of ideas concerning Hindu nationalism, the political history of modern India, the rise of great powers, authoritarianism in global politics, and China’s coming world order. He has prolonged experience across South Asia, East Asia and South East Asia in carrying out extensive interviewing and doing research in national archives
For my other works, visit: https://chris-ogden.org/
Recent Articles
- James Silverman ( Founder, U&I Global) interviews Arpit Chaturvedi (Co-founder and CEO, GPI) on AGENDA 2030- DO WE WANT IT? CENTRALISATION AND THE SDG’S
- Big Tech on Section 230 – Censorship or Disregard?
- Global Policy Insights (GPI) Annual India Colloquium.
- Antitrust hearing only a beginning on accountability
- The Commonwealth: Optimising Networks & Opportunities for the 21st Century
- Population Data in the Time of a Pandemic
- The Disconnect with Ground Realities
- Models to Make Vocational Training Work in India
- Comparing Health Care Systems in England, Taiwan, and the United States
- Commonwealth In Dialogue : Academic Series
- Are we rewarding fence-sitters and free-riders by relaxing penalties on CSR law violations?
- Changing Economic Models: From Mixed Economy to Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization in India
- Goods and Services Tax (GST) – a Seventeen Year Ordeal to a Uniform Indirect Tax Regime in India
-
Commonwealth In Dialogue: International leader Series
Podcast: Patsy Robertson, Chair Ramphall institute in conversation with Uday Nagaraju, Executive President and Neha Dewan, Fellow & Researcher about Commonwealth - Creating a future-proof curriculum for the digital age
- Commonwealth In Dialogue: High Commissioner Series": H.E Dr. Asha-Rose Migiro
- High Commissioner of the United Republic of Tanzania to the United Kingdom & Republic of Ireland in conversation with Uday Nagaraju, Executive
- Commonwealth In Dialogue: Parliamentary Speaker Series
- Louisa Wall - Marriage Equality in New Zealand
- Hon An치lu Farrugia, Speaker of the House of Representatives Parliament of Malta & Secretary General CPA Small branches speaks to Uday Nagaraju, Executive President & Co-founder of Global Policy Insights on Commonwealth, CPA Small branches and Parliament of Malta
- Commonwealth Series: Cyprus High Commissioner to the UK H.E Euripides L Evriviades interviewed by Uday Nagaraju, Executive President Global Policy Insights & Neha Dewan, Fellow & Researcher
- Global Policycast: Ex-Minister of State in the Ministry of Agriculture and Lands- Victor Cummings interviewed by Arpit Chaturvedi, C.E.O Global Policy Insights.
- Global Policycast: Ex-Minister of Youth, Paraguay- Magali Caceres interviewed by Arpit Chaturvedi, C.E.O Global Policy Insights.
- Commonwealth Series: CPA Secretary-General Akbar Khan interviewed by Uday Nagaraju, Executive President Global Policy Insights & Divya Pamulaparthy
- The Perils of Decentralization and other Buzzwords in Governance and Policymaking